Microsoft word - wec 20100915--final.doc
The Influence of Batteries on the growth of the
Electric Vehicle industry
World Energy Congress
Dr. Donald Pihsiang Wu
Subjects:
I. Charging speed and driving range
The importance of the battery for Electric Vehicles
III. Battery Durability
IV. Extremely safe battery module design
Electro-Mechanical combination know-how
VII. Charging Infrastructure
As you may already know, about half of the global CO2 released into the atmosphere is
generated by personal automobiles. In developing countries that number is about 2/3.
The internal combustion engine automobile has been commercialized for over a century
while the modern electric vehicle is starting again this century from ground zero after
manufacturers dabbled in it for over 10 years. Why? Because of the need to reduce
global warming gases such as CO2, electrifying the personal automobile has become an
urgent priority for many developed and developing nations. The heart of the electric
vehicle is the battery. The battery is of paramount importance to the development of
the electric vehicle.
Now let us discuss the impact of the battery on the development of the electric vehicle.
Besides cost concerns, the most important factors to the consumers are charging time
and driving range. The typical consumer has already been trained to demand charging
time as compared with refueling today's automobiles. Consumers begin losing interest
in electric vehicles when charging times are too long; so the quicker the charging time
the better. And while we are at it, consumers would be delighted to have driving range
between charges just as far or even farther than gasoline powered vehicles. On top of
that the faster the better.
No one has considered the initial joy upon the successful invention of the automobile
over a century ago! !!!!! The continual development of the automobile has already
spanned over a century, however, commercialization of the electric vehicle has not been
formally introduced. It will come soon enough. Because of the successful
development of the C-LiFePO4/LTO battery, the electric vehicle commercialization will
be soon. However, just like a newborn baby, we cannot ask too much of it in the
beginning. The speed of charging is a definite factor in the quick adoption of EVs.
Once the EV commercially enters the market it will soon become an important factor of
our daily lives. The EV will only need a few years to reach the target transportation
device as imagined by consumers today. So what we need today is an EV that charges
fast under 10 minutes with simple accessories and without too many complicated
capabilities. Like a baby that has to learn to crawl, walk then run, don't ask too much
of the EV in the initial stages. Too many demands in the initial stages will cause the
EV market to fail prematurely ignoring the importance of the EV market. An overly
simplistic viewpoint is to remove the internal combustion engine and put in a battery,
any type of battery, and call it an EV.
Battery – Next I would like to discuss the importance of the battery to the development
of the EV market. The motive batteries available today are lead acid batteries, fuel
cells and lithium batteries, etc. Lead acid batteries possess high toxicity, are
environmentally damaging, have a short life cycle and are heavy. Fuel cells still
require further refinements to become commercially viable. Hybrid vehicles still
require fossil fuels that contribute to global warming. Today we are here to talk about
Lithium Batteries. Within the lithium family of batteries there is the familiar lithium
cobalt battery, the lithium manganese battery, and the 3-elements, etc. The success and
failure of the electric vehicle hinges on the battery. With the electric vehicle being in
development for over 10 years without commercial success, the problem lies in the
battery. The battery alone determines the commercial survivability of the EV. The
selection of battery material and the quality of the battery material determines the kind
of life the battery will have. The selection of the cathode material determines the
position of the battery in the order of batteries. So the type of lithium battery selected
will determine the success or failure of the EV. Cobalt is prone to explosion.
Manganese and the 3-elements start degrading once they have been exposed to extreme
temperatures, is less stable and is dangerous to operate in an EV environment. The
cycle life for both Manganese and 3-elements are not very long, so the correct selection
is Carbon Coated Lithium Iron Phosphate.
Battery Durability – "PHET" and The Pihsiang Group in developing the EV has
researched tested and analyzed all of the aforementioned batteries. After careful
analysis of Lithium Cobalt, Manganese, 3-elements and etc. for durability, high and low
temperature tolerance, all of them cannot meet the characteristics desirable for
automotive needs without additional cumbersome gadgets. So the final choice is
carbon-coated lithium iron phosphate (C-LiFePO4). I will now emphasize the safety,
non-toxic, long cycle life winning characteristics of C-LiFePO4/LTO battery.
In 2005 "PHET" was the first global mass producer of C-LiFePO4 battery company.
While in the process of mass-producing C-LiFePO4 cells, The Pihsiang Group has
applied the same cells for EV development. In this process "PHET" has accumulated a
wealth of experience in Lithium Iron Phosphate battery manufacturing and usage
technology. There are over 30 vehicles being driven and tested world-wide today.
Each vehicle has logged from 10,000 to over 60,000 kilometers in real-world actual
driving conditions as well as in laboratory test conditions. So we are testing the EVs in
real-world and lab equipment monitored conditions in parallel. This differentiates us in
that most battery companies only test their batteries inside laboratories and limited road
tests. For battery companies that announce their batteries are good for a couple of
thousands of cycles or for many years of usage based only on laboratory tests or limited
road tests are just irresponsible. "PHET" batteries' usage on EVs is based on actual
road tests at high temperature as well as low temperatures on the actual road. Only the
C-LiFePO4 batteries have survived these road tests. Although the current comparative
capacity is slightly lower, the dimensional demands a little higher and having slightly
heavier weight than other lithium batteries, but the C-LiFePO4 battery is a "MUST". It
is because intrinsic safety is of the utmost importance, durability, high and low
temperature tolerance, long cycle life and non-toxicity makes C-LiFePO4 the undeniable
clear choice for EVs.
Extremely safe modular battery pack – such as the fault-tolerant DOSBAS® safety
system is based on individually fused 18650 battery cells connected in parallel to form a
basic module. From the basic module further parallel and/or serial connections are
made between the basic modules to form the desired capacity and voltage. Using this
philosophy to construct a battery pack the most challenging issues to battery packs are
solved: internal shorts are self-container, external shorts whether electrical in nature or
mechanical in nature are self-contained, impedance variations between cells are
minimized, future brand new battery cell replacements are tolerated by the aged battery
pack with different impedance cells. The DOSBAS® safety system battery pack has
been proven to be successfully applied to the EV and all other applications. The
DOSBAS® safety system was accepted by the scientific panel at the EVS 24 Symposium
as an important contribution for EV safety. After testing a vehicle collision between a
DOSBAS® safety system protected EV and a gasoline powered vehicle or another EV,
the DOSBAS® safety system protected EV proves itself to be reliable and safe. So for
a EV to be commercially successful, besides requiring battery durability and high-low
temperature tolerance, the most important trait is safety. Without safety nothing else
Whole vehicle reliability – EV relies on the harmonious balance of electro-mechanical
technology. The typical car manufacturer doesn't possess battery know-how; the
typical battery manufacturer doesn't possess car manufacturing know-how. Even those
who know both don't have the know-how to put everything together. The Internal
Combustion Engine (ICE) vehicle is based solely on mechanics. Consumers gauge the
ICE vehicle on speed, fuel economy and the ease with which the vehicle can be easily
diagnosed and repaired when there is fault. EVs on the other hand, will either drive or
not drive when desired. There is no "in-between" when it comes to EVs. It's either
on or off. If improperly designed, the EV will stop driving without apparent reason and
without warning. The other consideration when designing and building EVs are:
center of gravity, structural integrity and ease of repair. So the entire EV chassis must
be reconsidered for EVs only and not just swap out ICE chassis for use in EVs. New
designs, philosophies for EV chassis and outer shell to hold modular batteries must be
considered. After all, EVs should have its own designs apart from ICE vehicles due to
its different needs.
Cost – due the recent rise in demand for EVs, the production level of EV batteries has
not reached a level where economies of scale can help to lower cost. With the growth
of the EV market in the future, battery costs will be lowered dramatically. Another
main reason for future EVs to have lower total cost of ownership is due to EV's inherent
simplicity in having 75% fewer parts compared with ICE vehicles. This means future
initial EV costs will be lower as well as the service costs will be lower.
Charging infrastructure – the EV market will need a lot of help from governments
worldwide as well as the entrepreneurial initiatives of businesses to set up fast charging
stations, based on the battery barcode to recognize different batteries, different charging
C-rates and different charging modes to popularize the EV.
Due to time constraints, I would like to thank everyone and at the same time we should
all thank Dr. Goodenough of UT, Hydro-Quebec, CNRS and University of Montreal and
all the scientists that have dedicated their time and effort to the research of the wonderful
C-LiFePO4 material. Thank you!
Before leaving you all, please allow me a few more seconds to share what may or may
not be a joke about the future: if we don't act quickly to live responsibly with
sustainable renewable resources, dinosaurs will reappear on earth while humans will
become the hunted species.
Source: http://www.pihsiang.com.tw/news/pdf/20100917.pdf
Supporting people with dementia and theircarers in health and social care Issued: November 2006 NICE clinical guideline 42guidance.nice.org.uk/cg42 NICE has accredited the process used by the Centre for Clinical Practice at NICE to produceguidelines. Accreditation is valid for 5 years from September 2009 and applies to guidelines producedsince April 2007 using the processes described in NICE's 'The guidelines manual' (2007, updated2009). More information on accreditation can be viewed at www.nice.org.uk/accreditation
Stock Report 1-October-2016 Ticker: UCB BBUCB SA S&P Capital IQ Recommendation 12-Mo. Target Price EUR 68.83 (as of 30-September-2016) S&P Capital IQ Equity Analyst Jit Hoong Chan GICS Sector Health Care Summary UCB combines traditional synthetic chemistry and biotechnology approaches in targeting central nervous system (CNS), notably epilepsy, and immune & inflammatory