 
									
Cialis ist bekannt für seine lange Wirkdauer von bis zu 36 Stunden. Dadurch unterscheidet es sich deutlich von Viagra. Viele Schweizer vergleichen daher Preise und schauen nach Angeboten unter dem Begriff cialis generika schweiz, da Generika erschwinglicher sind.
Microsoft powerpoint - vpm_09_2011_mei_last
Patent Attorneys Attorneys-at-Law
München Basel Berlin
5th International VPM Days
Prolongation of Patent Term ???
Dr. Jürgen Meier
2011  Vossius & Partner
1. Claims in Medicine
• Examples of claim structure• Scope of protection
1. Beer, comprising at least 20% EtOH.
2. Pharmaceutical composition comprising beer as 
characterized in claim 1.
3. Beer as characterized in claim 1 for use in a 
method of treating stress release, nervous 
disorders and/or myogelosis. [EPC2000]
4. The pharmaceutical composition of claim 2 or the 
use of claim 3, wherein the beer is to be 
administered after sunset.
YES.he can! G2/08
!Dosage or Treatment Regimen Are Allowable!
His Patent will run for 20 years 
(Filing Date)
IP Protection for 
Factual Uncertainties
• patents filed at a very early stage of 
• only vague anticipation of product to 
be developed/marketed
• no anticipation of potentially 
infringing embodiments of 
IP Protection for Biologics (etc) 
Legal Uncertainties
First approval of originator Biosimilar/ 
20-year patent term
Data marketing exclusivity 
2. SPCs IN A NUTSHELL.
Supplementary Protection Certificates
COUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) No. 1768/92 of 18 June 1992 
concerning the creation of a Supplementary Protection 
Certificate for medicinal products (now codified under 
Regulation (EC) 469/2009)
Regulation (EC) No. 1610/96 of the European Parliament 
and of the Council of 23 July 1996 concerning the creation 
of a Supplementary Protection Certificate for plant 
protection products
Regulation (EC) No. 1901/2006 of the European Parliament 
and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on medicinal 
products for paediatric use
29 EFTA states and CH/LI Swiss national SPC
Regulation (EC) 469/2009
What is an SPC?
the SPC provides up to 5 years of additional proprietary 
protection + 6 month paediatric extension
Grant of M.A.
Filing date of patent
Actual exploitation of the patent
but only in respect of a product which has received a M.A. in 
the particular Member State
it DOES NOT (!!) extend the term of the patent itself
Patent Term Restoration and SPCs
SPC Regulation 
• max. 14 years from 1st MA
• max. 15 years from 1st MA
• max. 5 years from patent 
• max. 5 years from patent 
(+ ½ -year paediatric 
• only 1 restoration per 
• multiple SPCs per patent
• affiliation to MA holder
• no affiliation to MA holder 
• limited to approved 
• limited to approved 
3. THE PROTECTION CONFERRED 
"Whereas all the interests at 
stake, including those of 
public health … the protection 
granted should be strictly 
confined to the product 
which obtained authori-
zation to be placed on the 
market as a medicinal pro-
Art. 4 - Subject-matter of protection:
"Within the limits of the protection conferred by the basic 
patent, the protection conferred by a certificate shall 
extend only to the product covered by the authorization
to place the corresponding medicinal product on the market 
and for any use of the product as a medicinal product that has 
been authorized before the expiry of the certificate."
Art. 5 - Effects of the certificate:
"Subject to the provisions of Article 4, the certificate shall 
confer the same rights as conferred by the basic patent 
and shall be subject to the same limitations and the same 
The Objective of the SPC 
… to provide a guaranteed period of 15 
years "adequate protection" from the time 
the medicinal product in question first 
obtains authorization to be placed on the 
market to "cover the investment put into 
the research" …
Conditions for Obtaining a Certificate
Article 3 SPC
A certificate shall be granted in the Member State if…(a)
the product is protected by a basic patent in force;
a valid authorization to place the product on the 
market as a medicinal product has been granted in 
accordance with Directive .;
the product has not already been the subject of a
the authorization referred to in (b) is the (EP) first 
authorization to place the product on the market as 
a medicinal product.
Idarubicin hydrochloride
Claims of basic patent:
Idarubicin (free base only)
Description of basic patent:
only Idarubicin hydrochloride
Request for the grant of the SPC:
"Idarubicin and salts thereof, including Idarubicin 
Art. 3(a) and (b) 
The approved product must be 
protected by a basic patent
• approved product must be covered by the 
scope of protection of the basic patent, i.e.,
literal wording and scope of equivalence
• definition of the product should not extend 
beyond the scope of the patent
"19. If the certificate did not cover the actual medicinal product, as protected by the basic patent and one of the 
possible forms of which is the subject-matter of a marketing 
authorisation, the fundamental objective of Regulation would 
"22. Where a product in the form referred to in the marketing 
authorisation is protected by a basic patent in force, the 
certificate is capable of covering that product, as a medicinal 
product, in any of the forms enjoying the protection of the 
Adalimumab/Yeda Research
Dutch Council of State
Farmitalia
Supplementary Protection Certificates covering 
biological substances
SPC application:
"human monoclonal antibodies 
against tumor necrosis factor-alfa"
Adalimumab/Yeda Research
"The assumption that related biological drugs, [like 
small molecules] … 
have the same therapeutic 
value can not be made. It has not been made 
plausible that, in the case of "adalimumab" and 
other monoclonal antibodies against "tumor 
necrosis factor alpha", such an equivalence can in 
principle be assumed. "Adalimumab" has been 
attributed as an INN to a monoclonal antibody 
consisting of a sequence of 1330 amino acids by 
the WHO. For such a tremendously complicated 
structure it is troublesome to foresee the precise 
effects induced by every of the possible variants of 
the monoclonal antibody."
4. COMBINATION OF ACTIVE 
The "Disclosure Test" vs. the
1. The "Disclosure Test":
The combination must be 
disclosed or 
identifiable in the basic patent (GB, FR, DE, 
2. The "Infringement Test"
The combination must 
infringe the patent 
pursuant to Article 69 EPC (CH, NO, CZ)
Combination of Active Ingredients
Approved Product: combination of salmeterol 
and flucticasone
Basic Patent: combination of salmeterol and 
flucticasone
Combination of Active Ingredients
Approved Product: fosinopril + hydrochlorothiazide
Basic Patent: fosinopril
"Für ein als Arzneimittel zugelassenes Erzeugnis, das aus 
zwei Wirkstoffen zusammengesetzt ist, kann auch dann ein 
ergänzendes Schutzzertifikat beansprucht werden, wenn 
das Grundpatent nur einen der beiden Wirkstoffe nennt und 
beschreibt." 
[mBGE 124 III 375] 
Combination of Active Ingredients
Approved Product: combination of 
lansoprazole and clarithromycin
Basic Patent: only lansoprazole
SPC refused: The so-called "combination" of lansoprazole 
and an antibiotic would only infringe because of the presence 
of the lansoprazole. In truth, the combination is not as such 
"protected by a basic patent in force". What is protected is 
only the lansoprazole element of that combination. (Jacob J, 
para. 10[2004], RPC, 3)
Basic patent: Method claim for the preparation of
an acellular 
B. pertussis vaccine
Approved Product (Government Health Policy):
Multi-vaccine against:
• Whooping cough
Questions referred to the ECJ:
What is meant in Article 3(a) of the Regulation by "the product is protected by a basic 
patent in force" and what are the criteria for deciding this?
• 4. Is a multi-disease vaccine "protected by a basic patent" if 
one antigen of the vaccine 
is covered by the patent?
• 5. Is a multi-disease vaccine "protected by a basic patent" if 
all antigen of the vaccine 
is covered by the patent?
(i.e. : …are there different criteria in respect of a 
medicinal product comprising more than one activeingredient or for a multi-disease vaccine…?????)
C-322/10 / C-422/10 Medeva 
and Georgetown University and Others
Opinion AG Trstenjak 1
Handed down on July 13th, 2011
Answer from Attorney General: ?????
"SPC for compound X should be granted"
"Said SPC would also cover X +Y"
"However, only one SPC (for "X") should be allowed"
CONTRADICTION!!!!!! How will the European Court of Justice now react?
5. MULTIPLE SPCs?
"The product has not already been 
the subject of a certificate."
On face value Article 3(c) seems to 
imply that for any one product 
only a single certificate may be 
C-181/95 Biogen/SmithKline Beecham
1. Where a medicinal product is covered 
by several basic patents, the SPC 
Regulation No. 1768/92 "does not 
preclude the grant of a Supplementary 
Protection Certificate to each holder of 
a basic patent".
Conditions for Obtaining a Certificate
Article 3 (2) EC 1610/96
The holder of more than one patent for the same 
product shall not be granted more than one certificate 
for that product. However, where two or more 
applications concerning the same product and emanating 
from two or more holders of different patents are 
pending, one certificate for this product may be issued 
to each of these holders.
Recital 17 of the preamble of EC 1610/96
Whereas the detailed rules in … Articles 3 (2). of this 
Regulation are also valid, 
mutatis mutandis, for the 
interpretation . of 3 of Council Regulation (EEC) No.
Prior approval: Citalopram
Marketing approval: S–Citalopram
Basic patent: S-Citalopram
FSC (BGH):
Prior approval of racemic compound is no bar to the 
issue of an SPC for an enantiomer of the compound 
if it is the subject-matter of a later marketing 
authorisation and a substance patent of its own.
C-258/99 
Different ratios of active ingredient: 
impurities are regarded as the 
same 
• Implantable wafer comprising carmustine for the 
treatment of brain tumours.
• Carmustine is embedded in a matrix wafer, 
controlling the local release of the toxic 
chemotherapeutic agent
• Well-tolerated, low toxicity• Significant prolongation of life expectancy
"combination of active ingredients of 
a medicinal product" should only 
include substances which have a 
therapeutic effect of their own for a 
specific indication"
7. SPC INFRINGEMENT CASE LAW
BE: Combination Does 
• SPC/Paediatric extention• Lorsartan 
Generic product:
• Lorsartan + HCZ
• SPC/Paediatric extention• Lorsartan 
Generic product:
• Lorsartan + HCZ 
• Injunctive relief granted
Generic product: Valsartan + HCZ
• Injunctive relief granted, confirmed 
by higher regional court
• Valsartan +HTZ
• Court Settlement
Patent Attorneys Attorneys-at-Law
München Basel Berlin
Thank you for your attention!
Source: http://vaccine-manager.eu/en/resources/5.-VPM-Tage-Presentations/Juergen_Meier.pdf
   Annual Report for the Year 2002 National Institute of Physics College of Science, University of the Philippines Diliman, Quezon City 1101, Philippines Table of Contents I. Executive Summary Caesar Saloma, Ph.D.Director of Institute II. Report of the Deputy Director for Academic Affairs Ronald Banzon, Ph.D. III. Report of the Deputy Director for Research & Extensions
    Forschung · WissenschaftRecherche · Science Assistant Editor Rédacteur en chef Jürg Meyer, Basel Urs Belser, Genève Tuomas Waltimo, Basel Rudolf Gmür, ZürichPeter Hotz, Bern Advisory board / Gutachtergremium / Comité de lecture P. Baehni, Genève K.H. Jäger, Basel M. Perrier, Lausanne J.-P. Bernard, Genève